structuraline

Coverage

All 87 paragraphs, accounted for.

A schedule file cannot evidence a pre-construction meeting or a narrative report. Rather than quietly skip those paragraphs, we list them. This page counts every paragraph in the specification's own table of contents and shows where each one went.

Specification  USACE UFGS 01 32 01.00 10 Project Schedule
Edition  August 2026  ·  Agency  USACE
Source  https://www.wbdg.org/FFC/DOD/UFGS/UFGS%2001%2032%2001.00%2010.pdf
87
Paragraphs in the spec
45
Checked by a rule
42
Listed for your review
0
Unaccounted for
Checked automaticallyListed for a person to confirm
1.11.21.32.12.1.12.1.22.1.2.12.1.2.23.13.1.13.23.2.13.2.23.2.33.33.3.13.3.23.3.33.3.43.3.53.3.63.3.73.3.7.13.3.7.23.3.7.33.3.7.43.3.7.53.3.7.63.3.7.73.3.7.83.3.83.3.8.13.3.8.23.3.8.33.3.8.3.13.3.8.3.23.3.93.3.103.3.113.3.123.3.133.3.143.3.153.3.163.3.173.3.183.3.193.3.203.3.20.13.3.20.23.3.213.43.4.13.4.23.4.2.13.4.33.53.5.13.5.23.5.33.5.3.13.5.3.23.5.43.5.4.13.5.4.23.5.4.33.5.4.43.5.4.53.63.6.13.6.23.73.83.8.13.8.23.8.33.8.43.8.53.8.63.8.73.93.9.13.9.23.9.33.103.113.12

What we ask you to confirm yourself

Each of these is a requirement of the specification that no schedule file can prove. Every report ends with this list.

References, submittal procedure and scheduler qualifications

Paragraphs 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 3.1, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5

The contract names the reference standards, the submittal route your schedule must travel, and the experience your scheduler must hold. Confirm the person preparing the schedule meets the stated qualifications and that the submittal goes through the specified channel.

Scheduling software

Paragraphs 2.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.2.2

The specification states which software is acceptable and what you must provide if you use something other than the Government default. A file that opens on your machine is not evidence that it opens on theirs — confirm the version before submitting.

Meetings you must attend

Paragraphs 3.1.1, 3.6, 3.6.1, 3.6.2, 3.7

A Scheduling Expectations Kickoff Meeting at the start, a schedule update meeting each period, and weekly progress meetings throughout. The update you submit must be the one agreed at the meeting. Missing these is a compliance failure no file inspection can reveal.

Documents submitted alongside the schedule

Paragraphs 3.5.2, 3.5.3, 3.5.3.1, 3.5.3.2, 3.5.4, 3.5.4.1, 3.5.4.2, 3.5.4.3, 3.5.4.4, 3.5.4.5

A narrative report, a logic report, an earnings report by CLIN, and a network diagram showing continuous flow, milestone dates, the critical path and the required grouping and sorting. The schedule file alone is an incomplete submission.

Level of detail and the update cycle

Paragraphs 3.3.1, 3.4.2.1, 3.4.3

The required level of detail, design package fragnets for design-build work, and the periodic update cycle. Whether the schedule is broken down finely enough to measure progress honestly is a judgement made by the reviewer, not by a rule.

Time extensions and delay analysis

Paragraphs 3.8, 3.8.1, 3.8.2, 3.8.3, 3.8.4, 3.8.5, 3.8.6, 3.8.7

Justifying delay, distinguishing changes that do not cause delay, time impact analysis for prospective claims, forensic analysis for retrospective ones, fragnets, and the effect on an early completion schedule. These are procedures to follow when something goes wrong, not properties of the file.

Rights the contract reserves

Paragraphs 3.9, 3.9.2, 3.9.3, 3.10

Failure to perform, the recovery schedule the Government may require, and the ownership of float. Float belongs to the project, not to either party alone — meaning you cannot assume spare time in the schedule is yours to consume.

Uploading the schedule into the system of record

Paragraphs 3.11

The schedule data has to reach the Government's Construction Contract System of Record. Payment under FAR 52.232-5 depends on the Government receiving an acceptable and approvable electronic version — so this step is not administrative housekeeping, it is the step your progress payment is conditioned on.

HomeRequirement index